Marlean Ames filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit in 2020 after she lost out on two jobs to colleagues who were gay at the Ohio Youth Department.

Why is the Ames decision potentially so significant It may very well signal the death knell of reverse discrimination as a ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday sent the case of an Ohio woman who contends that she was the victim of reverse discrimination back to the lower courts. In a unanimous ruling […] ...

Marlean Ames said she was the victim of bias in an agency overseeing Ohio 's youth correctional facilities, with her case being decided in a rare unanimous ruling.

The Supreme Court unanimously determined that Marlean Ames can move forward with her complaint that she was passed her over for promotion because she is heterosexual.

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously revived a 2020 lawsuit by Marlean Ames, who claims she was discriminated against for being heterosexual by the Ohio Department of Youth Services.

The Supreme Court on Thursday revived a lawsuit from an Ohio woman who​ claimed she was the victim of reverse discrimination.

This decision is a rebuke to those who have sought to manipulate civil rights protections into a hierarchy of grievance.

Marlean Ames argued she faced too high a legal burden in pressing her claim after being passed over and demoted in favor of a lesbian and a gay man.

The Supreme Court supported the 'reverse discrimination' case of Marlean Ames, who claims she didn’t get a job and then was demoted because she is straight.

The unanimous decision was written by the most junior justice, liberal Ketanji Brown Jackson, and with a concurring opinion ...