This conflict will solve nothing, and absent the collapse of the Iranian regime, it is quite possible that an even more consequential security threat may emerge in the future.

In recalibrating its position on the Israel-Iran conflict, India’s assessment can’t lose sight of tightrope walking, given the geopolitical, economic and strategic significance both countries hold for India. New Delhi has to straddle diverse worlds of interests between Tehran and Tel Aviv, with an elbow room of its own.

The drums of conflict in the Middle East have once again captured global attention, with the long-simmering tensions between Israel and Iran reaching a critical point. While headlines often focus on immediate escalations,

Trump told the Wall Street Journal that he knew all about Israel’s plan ahead of time, that he wasn’t given a mere “heads-up.”

Israel initiated military strikes inside Iran in the wee hours of June 13. Ordered by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, these precise attacks are set to continue “as long as necessary”. The meticulously planned assault focused on military and governmental targets in Tehran.

Israel’s prime minister sees himself not only as the protector of Israel, but the saviour of the West. This, he believes, is how he should go down in history, writes former Israeli diplomat Alon Pinka

The two nations are the most important for understanding the development of geopolitics in the Middle-East in the last decade as fire is exchanged.

He emphasized that the collapse of the Assad regime has severely impaired the logistical and weapons support once funneled to Hezbollah from Syria, marking a strategic loss for Tehran. "The Syrian regime